NCW背景下的潜艇对水面舰艇编队威胁判断

针对网络中心战(NCW)背景下水面舰艇编队反潜的实际情况,采用层次分析理论探究潜艇对水面舰艇编队的威胁判断问题。将编队攻击意图系数和编队攻击达成系数引入威胁判断,从编队攻击意图推理、攻击紧迫程度和攻击达成可能性三个方面建立了潜艇对于威胁的总体感知模型框架。该模型框架较之以往更全面地考虑了水面舰艇编队对潜艇的威胁因素,为下一步刻画潜艇对威胁的感知提供基础。     

军用决策支持系统中评估主攻方向符合上级意图的建模研究

依据相应的军事原则,对如何评估主攻方向符合上级意图进行了定量化分析研究,构建了多个评估模型,为辅助指挥员更加迅速、准确地判定主攻方向提供了一种有效的解决途径。     

A Critique of the Right Intention Condition as an Element of Jus ad Bellum

According to just war theory, a resort to war is justified only if it satisfies the right intention condition. This article offers a critical examination of this condition, defending the thesis that, despite its venerable history as part of the just war tradition, it ought to be jettisoned. When properly understood, it turns out to be an unnecessary element of jus ad bellum, adding nothing essential to our assessments of the justice of armed conflict.     

理、情、意、行——思想政治工作的四要素

我国思想政治工作者在实践中总结出来的"晓之以理、动之以情、持之以恒、导之以行"的十六字方针,是对思想政治工作规律的反映,其中的"理"、"情"、"意"、"行"是做好思想政治工作的四个基本因素,它们在思想政治工作中起着各自不可替代的作用.     

基于时序特征编码的目标战术意图识别算法?

对战场目标战术意图的快速、准确和自动识别，是智能决策的前提和基础。目标战术意图通常由多个战术动作组合完成，因而目标状态呈现动态、时序变化特征。本文针对目标意图识别问题的特点，提出一种基于栈式自编码器（ SAE）的智能识别模型，设计智能识别模型的基本框架，提出一种基于时序特征的输入信号编码方法及相应的模式解析机制，通过将目标状态在多个时刻的时序特征和战场环境、目标属性等信息统一编码为输入信号，将军事专家的知识经验封装为模式标签，模拟人的推理模式与认知经验，实现对目标战术意图的智能识别。最后通过实验，分析预训练过程和网络深度对算法性能的影响，并通过与多层感知机（MLP）和逻辑回归分类器（LRC）识别准确率的比较，验证所提SAE算法的有效性。     

Right Intention and the Ends of War

The jus ad bellum criterion of right intention (CRI) is a central guiding principle of just war theory. It asserts that a country’s resort to war is just only if that country resorts to war for the right reasons. However, there is significant confusion, and little consensus, about how to specify the CRI. We seek to clear up this confusion by evaluating several distinct ways of understanding the criterion. On one understanding, a state’s resort to war is just only if it plans to adhere to the principles of just war while achieving its just cause. We argue that the first understanding makes the CRI superfluous, because it can be subsumed under the probability of success criterion. On a second understanding, a resort to war is just only if a state’s motives, which explain its resort to war, are of the right kind. We argue that this second understanding of the CRI makes it a significant further obstacle to justifying war. However, this second understanding faces a possible infinite regress problem, which, left unresolved, leaves us without a plausible interpretation of the CRI. This constitutes a significant and novel reason for leaving the CRI out of the international law of armed conflict (LOAC).     

应科学规范地组织实施心理行为训练

心理行为训练在武警部队得到了越来越广泛的应用，但是它专业技术性比较强，有一套系统科学的训练程序和规范要求。如果不按科学规律办事，缺乏严密的组织，不仅达不到心理行为训练的预期效果，还可能导致受训人员出现心理反应。因此，要提高心理行为训练的有效性，就必须科学规范地组织施训。     

Fighting a Just War in the Midst of an Unreasonable International Strife: World War I and the Collapse of the Central European System of the Triple Imperial Dominion

ABSTRACT

This article constitutes an attempt to demonstrate the complexity of factors affecting the legitimate acquisition and reasonable exercise by a political community of the right to war as specified in the just war criteria of jus ad bellum. To achieve this purpose, a brief analysis is presented of the intentional participation in World War I of thousands of Polish volunteers forming military units deployed by the Central Powers on the Austrian-Russian front. Considered in light of the standard principles of just war, the military enterprise of the Polish Legions, as they were called, turns out to be a paradoxical instance of warfare which, while being part of a state-to-state aggression, must be deemed compliant with all the principles in question. As a means of explaining this paradox, a modification of the concept of justified intervention is proposed, embracing military efforts aimed at the ultimate defeat of all the (unjustly) warring parties operating within a given territory. In consonance with the classic just war approach, it is also argued that the justification for such an intervention is essentially dependent on its being initiated by, or attributable to, an unquestionable state agent acting in defence of the state’s basic prerogatives.